Amy Howorth

In 2017, they emphasized the need for public clarity on pension figures, noting the importance of transparency [6]. In 2019, they supported the stabilization of pension funds but stressed the need for optimal returns for the community [20]. In 2025, they supported budget appropriation from insurance and pension funds for the fiscal year 24-5 [31].

Over time: From emphasizing public clarity on pension figures in 2017 [6], they later supported budget appropriation from pension funds in 2025 [31].

Amy T. Howorth supported maintaining momentum for the Downtown Specific Plan implementation in 2015, acknowledging concerns about funding and the ULI report [4]. In 2015, she advocated for community engagement in planning code amendments, emphasizing the need for a public workshop to clarify terms like 'open space' [8]. In 2016, she supported the Planning Commission's recommendations for live-work land use and retail regulations in the Downtown Specific Plan [15]. In 2018, she expressed concerns about the visual impact of taller buildings on Sepulveda Boulevard and advocated for tailored policies for the commercial corridor [22]. In 2023, she supported a consultant for downtown planning but stressed the need for an explicit residential impact analysis [32].

Over time: From 2015 to 2018, Howorth shifted from advocating for general community engagement in planning processes to expressing specific concerns about the visual impact of development on Sepulveda Boulevard [8][22]. By 2023, she continued to support downtown planning but emphasized the need for explicit residential impact analysis, indicating a more detailed focus on development consequences [32].

Amy T. Howorth has consistently supported traffic and mobility initiatives that enhance safety and community identity, such as bike paths [10], sharrows [11], and LED streetlights [8]. She has also supported structured planning for wayfinding [3] and traffic calming measures [16], while opposing approaches that she felt lacked community input or clarity, such as using Carmel as a reference for signage [4] or abrupt parking rate increases [38]. She has expressed concerns about parking reductions [5], safety in public spaces [12], and the feasibility of temporary parking solutions [30].

Over time: Howorth shifted from opposing parking reduction in public space proposals in 2016 [5] to supporting structured traffic calming measures by 2023 [16].

Amy T. Howorth has consistently supported various recreational and public space initiatives, including the Skateboard Park Update [6], the Marine Avenue Park Skate Spot Project [10], the Marine Field Turf Replacement [16], and the Roundhouse Aquarium Maintenance Funding Request [26]. She has also supported broader community and environmental projects such as the Bike Repair Station Installation [14], the Veterans Parkway Trail Improvements [12], and the Turf Replacement and Drought-Resistant Landscaping [18]. Additionally, she has emphasized the importance of strategic planning and financial responsibility in Parks and Recreation matters [3].

Over time: Howorth shifted from supporting the Skateboard Park Update in 2015 [6] to opposing concerns about the Skate Park Location and Grant Authorization in 2016 [7].

Amy T. Howorth supported environmental initiatives such as the Environmental Impact Report certification in 2014 [2], the Food Waste Recycling Program in 2015 and 2017 [7], and the Climate Action Plan in 2017 [10]. She also supported transitioning to 100% renewable energy in 2018 and 2020 [13][20]. In 2016, she supported opposition to the West Basin Desalination Plant proposal, emphasizing environmental protection [5]. In 2024, she raised concerns about improper disposal of pet waste in green bins [22].

Over time: Howorth shifted from a neutral stance on the Waste Management Contract in 2019 [18] to questioning transparency in a 2024 rate increase [24].

Amy T. Howorth has consistently supported various public art and cultural initiatives, including the Youth Art Education Initiative [4], the City Hall Lobby Art Project [9], and the installation of a shark mural at Civic Plaza [17]. She has also supported hybrid models for sculpture gardens and murals, favoring fewer permanent pieces and rotating temporary installations [13]. Howorth has expressed support for public-private partnerships in cultural projects, such as the Strand-Alcove Bench Program [3], and has emphasized transparency in public art maintenance and deaccessioning [20]. She has also supported the inclusion of cultural elements in city identity, such as the Camellia flower designation [15] and the use of the city logo on signage [19].

Over time: Howorth shifted from supporting the exploration of new processes for art selection without immediate action in 2013 [1] to advocating for specific changes in public art visibility and branding by 2024 [17][19].

In 2016, they argued for a TOT as a viable revenue source, citing HERMOSA Beach's success [3]. In 2018, they supported a stormwater service fee increase as necessary to address subsidy issues [6]. In 2023, they supported a stormwater fee increase as an investment in clean water but advocated for extending the ballot deadline to January 17th for better public engagement [9]. In 2023, they expressed concern about reliance on city funds for 60% of capital projects and supported the fee resolution [11]. In 2025, they questioned why water rates increased despite the treatment plant's potential savings [16].

Over time: They shifted from advocating for a TOT as a revenue source in 2016 [3] to supporting direct fee increases in 2018 [6] and 2023 [9].

In 2013, they noted the potential influence of social media on crime perception [3] and praised grants for innovative crime prevention programs [1]. In 2014, they supported expanding Neighborhood Watch to improve safety and community bonding [4]. In 2015, they argued for increased police department funding to address rising property crime rates [5]. In 2018, they supported allocating budget funds for school safety measures and emphasized the need for both physical and non-physical safety [7]. In 2023, they supported selective coyote trapping as a public safety measure [12] and advocated for intensified e-bike enforcement before summer [13]. In 2026, they supported diversion programs for e-bike enforcement and inquired about training programs and school involvement [21].

Over time: They shifted from supporting community-based crime prevention and funding for police in 2014-2015 [4][5] to advocating for specific enforcement measures related to e-bikes in 2023-2026 [13][21].

In 2014, they supported aggressive investment in seawall upgrades to prevent erosion [2], and in 2014, they opposed the Southern California Edison Infrastructure Upgrade Project due to concerns about residents with medical needs during power outages [3]. In 2017, they supported agendizing a city-wide discussion on emergency communication protocols and reverse 911 opt-in procedures [8]. In 2023, they stressed the need for a clear plan to notify vulnerable residents during heat emergencies [14].

Over time: They shifted from opposing infrastructure projects due to resident concerns [3] to supporting broader community discussions on emergency communication protocols [8].

In 2018, they expressed opposition to outdoor dining due to concerns about community disputes and commercialization [1][2]. In 2019, they called for clear definitions of 'outdoor dining' and rooftop dining [3]. In 2020, they raised equity concerns in the permitting process [4]. In 2021, they supported extending the outdoor dining program through Labor Day but questioned its long-term impacts [5]. In 2022, they supported forming a working group with resident representation to address the issue [6]. In 2023, they opposed the program due to fairness concerns in permit access [7]. In 2024, they supported outdoor dining but raised concerns about parking, small business impact, and cost-sharing [9][10][11]. In 2025, they remained neutral, noting state legislation's impact on local regulations [12][13].

Over time: They shifted from opposition in 2018 [1][2] to support in 2021 [5] and 2024 [9][10][11], before returning to opposition in 2023 [7].

In 2015, they supported zoning-based restrictions on short-term rentals to preserve community character [3]. By 2018, they stated that the 2015 ban was unenforceable and advocated for a structured program with enforcement tools to protect community character [8]. In 2019, they supported enforcing existing rules to protect rental stock and community character [10]. In 2026, they supported a temporary short-term rental ordinance for the FIFA World Cup with enforcement tools and public safety funding [13].

Over time: They shifted from supporting zoning-based restrictions in 2015 [3] to advocating for a structured program with enforcement tools in 2018 [8], and later to supporting enforcement of existing rules in 2019 [10].

In 2015, they supported smoking ordinances for multi-unit housing but requested exceptions for Manhattan Village [2][3]. They also supported a smoke-free housing initiative but emphasized e-cigarettes as a cessation tool [1]. In 2016, they supported a prohibition on medical marijuana cultivation to allow for further data collection [5]. In 2022, they advocated for expanded buffer zones and youth product restrictions for cannabis retail [9], but later opposed cannabis retail due to youth safety and public health risks [10].

Over time: They shifted from supporting cannabis retail regulation with buffer zones in 2022 [9] to opposing cannabis retail in 2022 due to youth safety and public health concerns [10].

In 2022, they supported ending the local emergency and rescinding related policies [10]. In 2025, they supported using the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan to guide disaster resilience infrastructure improvements [11].

Over time: From 2022 to 2025, they shifted from supporting the rescission of emergency policies to supporting long-term disaster resilience planning [10][11].

Amy T. Howorth supported explicit acknowledgment of 'racially motivated' actions in the Bruce's Beach plaque and advocated for ADA compliance in its placement [1][2]. She raised questions about monument design and park stability but remained neutral on the monument's design and implementation [3][4]. Howorth supported allocating funds for the public art project and emphasized the need for sufficient funding [5]. She backed addressing historical injustices and supported the apology as a necessary step for accountability and community healing [6][7]. Howorth also supported community engagement in Juneteenth events and alignment with Black-owned businesses [8][9].

Over time: Howorth shifted from neutral to supportive positions regarding the apology for historical racial injustices at Bruce's Beach [6][7].

In 2017, they strongly supported Measure H for funding homeless prevention [1]. In 2019, they suggested incrementally increasing the Homelessness Task Force membership to 11 over time [3]. In 2023, they clarified legislative details related to homelessness without taking a clear position [4], and asked for clarification on overestimation of a conversion factor in homeless services [5]. In 2024, they emphasized the need for consistent data on homeless encounters and collaboration with the LA Football Club [6], and supported regional collaboration and data-sharing in the South Bay Cities Functional Zero Homelessness Program [7].

Over time: They transitioned from supporting specific funding measures and task force expansion in 2017 and 2019 [1][3], to focusing on data accuracy and regional collaboration in 2023 and 2024 [5][7].

Amy T. Howorth expressed a neutral position on ROD Project Notifications and Public Engagement, emphasizing that notices should use plain language to ensure residents understand their implications and avoid legal jargon that may mislead [2].